Purchase of shares of Magnit by VTB will revive the rent in street retail
Purchase of shares of Magnit by VTB will revive the rent in street retail
15.02.2018

The purchase by VTB Bank of a blocking stake in the Magnit is capable of giving impetus to the development of the retailer and bringing a revival to the rental market in street retail, experts say.

Egor Levchenko, head of the retail real estate department at ILM, notes that Magnit has been influencing rental rates in street retail for a long time. He believes that the acquisition by such a large player, like VTB, is aimed at further development. "Any development leads to an increase in market share, and for this you need to open new points," said the expert, stressing that "this is positive news for the market."

Levchenko admits that Magnit may expand its product line and make changes to the format of stores. At the same time, he notices that this will not happen immediately, at least a month will be spent on audit.

ILM’s managing partner, Andrei Lukashev, adds that Magnit will have an impact not only on rental in street retail, but also in the warehouse segment.

Read more RIA News:

https://realty.ria.ru/realtynews/20180216/1514800476.html

Categories
Еще новости
Renovation changes the concept of commercial real estate
Expert opinion
Renovation changes the concept of commercial real estate
On January 16-18, the annual Gaidar Forum 2018 was held in Moscow to discuss the problems and challenges of Russia's development. Within the framework of the forum, a large expert discussion "New life of big cities: an analysis of risks and solutions" took place. ILM Managing Partner Andrei Lukashev made a presentation on it “The Impact of Redevelopment Policy on Investment Attractiveness of the Territories and Business”    Renovation has become a significant trend for all major cities in the world. Huge industrial areas get a new life and attract the attention of investors and businessmen. The commercial real estate market in Paris has 3.5 million square meters. m vacant space in London - 3.4 million square meters. m. In Moscow, the figure is 4.2 million square meters. Over the past three years, the volume of new commercial space in the capital has decreased. On the contrary, the areas located in the objects of renovation, are in stable demand. It can be assumed that the experience of cluster development - the global trend - will be successful in Russia.  Andrei Lukashev cited data on average base rental rates for office space. The comparison was carried out between the "classic" business centers and offices in the objects of renovation. In all classes (B-, B + and A) the rate in reconstructed business clusters is higher than in BC. And in class A, the difference reaches 15,000 rubles. New formats of commercial real estate turned out to be very attractive for large Russian and foreign companies. In general, for 2017, the demand for premises up to 100 square meters in some areas of renovation increased by 30-40%.  Judging by the trends and development of the market in Europe and America, it becomes obvious to us that the future lies in the new real estate formats. Already, coworking, coliving, joint trading and warehouse spaces; temporary stores (Pop-up retail) are actively fighting for market share. The renovation program will help to meet this demand, at the same time transforming the urban space, making it more convenient and comfortable for life.
Read more
21.01.2018
Andrei Protasov: "The future of investment in commercial real estate - alternative financing"
Expert opinion
Andrei Protasov: "The future of investment in commercial real estate - alternative financing"
Investment activity in the commercial real estate market depends on the general situation in the real estate market and in the financial market. And if we talk about the financing of commercial real estate, then a lot depends on the situation in the wide financial market, but it is also important to have additional tools that are used in the market now and help to survive crisis times with minimal losses. If a lot has already been written about the first one but not for the second topic. Let us try to examine in more detail the existing tools with Andrey Protasov, managing director of ILM. - Andrei, what is happening now with crediting in real estate? - The source of crediting in our market is only banks, and the source of own funds, as a rule, are private investment funds. Each of these players operates within its strategy and capabilities - this limits the availability of capital for real estate, although there is capital in the country whose owners would like to invest in real estate, but do not have the right tools. In the west, there are tools that allow a wider range of investors to take part in investing in real estate, in addition, there are more types of players. - What tools and market participants exist in the west that we don’t have? - In the west, there is a tool CMBS (Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities), which allows you to transfer loans to commercial real estate to other investors. In this scheme, all work on the issuance of loans, including verification of assets, legal documentation and the actual issuance of financing, is done by the bank, but then it essentially sells the right to claim these loans to investors. These CMBS instruments receive investment ratings and are then sold to investors who themselves would not be able to issue loans due to the lack of expertise and the availability of the required amount of funds. As a result, for example, loans for ten objects are resold to hundreds of investors, and each receives the required diversification and profitability level. In Russia, a similar instrument exists in the mortgage sector, where banks issue loans, and then resell them with AHML, which in turn repacks them and resells them to various investors in the financial market. Without this mechanism, it would be impossible to increase the issuance of mortgage loans for housing. Even in the West, active players in the credit market are not only banks, but institutional investors, namely, debt funds, insurance companies and pension funds. - Why is there no such option in our market? - First of all, these are natural causes - an insufficient number of investors who have the appropriate required risk profile - low risk, low profitability. In addition, the lack of appropriate expertise within the relevant organizations affects. The insurance and pension industries have existed in the West for over a hundred years, and the leading players in these sectors have been operating for more than fifty years. As a result, they have a huge amount of capital, which they have accumulated over the period of their existence. In Russia, there are only a few players who have existed for more than 15 years, and they have not yet had time to accumulate enough funds to become significant players in the real estate market. However, they are presented. However, regular restrictions on the amount and form of funds invested by insurance companies and pension funds also play a role. - With credit financing is understandable. But investing in real estate own funds - how is things in Russia in this regard? - Here the tools and types of players do not differ from what is in the west. Only the breadth of use and the activity of certain players differ. The largest investors in real estate in the west are pension funds and insurance companies. Here these players are not so active. Significant players in the west are also various structures and forms of collective investment. The main structure is REIT (Real Estate Investment Trust), and each developed country has its own implementation of this idea. The main goal of the structure is to create a mechanism for collective investment, which will protect investors and be convenient for them from a tax point of view. They regulate the relationship between the management company, the assets of the fund (cash or real estate) and the shareholders (investors). They do not pay income tax on operations within the fund, each shareholder pays this tax in accordance with their tax regime (for example, individuals pay only personal income tax). Investing in REIT is very common among private investors in the west. In Russia, this form appeared in the early 2000s and is called ZPIFN (Closed Share Investment Real Estate Fund). The tool began to gain popularity among small private investors in 2004. However, the 2008 crisis and fraud by a number of management companies led to a loss of investment in the vast majority of such tools. As a result, this tool is now used only (with a few exceptions) to protect property rights and information about ultimate owners and to optimize taxation. However, I am sure that over time this tool will begin to gain popularity among private investors, since there are no alternatives to it. For several years, there have been funds managed by a management company established by Sberbank. Its team manages to fill its funds with attractive assets and, as a result, show income to its investors. - Crowd funding platforms as applied to real estate are becoming an increasingly debated topic. Is there a future for such a format in our country? - Definitely - yes! This is a promising and sought-after tool. In essence, this is a collective investment mechanism (which can be built on the basis of closed-end investment funds), complemented by the opportunities that the Internet represents. Attraction and interaction is carried out through the Internet, which reduces the costs of the Management company and increases the transparency and convenience for the client-investor. This form is relatively young and only developing, although in the West there are already about a hundred startups in this area. In Russia, AKTIVO, founded by renowned Internet entrepreneur Oscar Hartman, is a prime example. An effective Internet platform has been created, but success will depend on whether the team succeeds in finding attractive investment opportunities and adequately manage the acquired assets. A necessary component of success in the collective investment market is investor confidence, which is determined by reputation and success. An investor is only as good as his last deal!   Posted by cre.ru
Read more
24.05.2017
Ekaterina Volkova, director of market research and analysis department at ILM, explains catch of a low rental rate
Expert opinion
Ekaterina Volkova, director of market research and analysis department at ILM, explains catch of a low rental rate
Interview of Ekaterina Volkova for the portal "Real Estate and Prices" Starting to find an office, many business owners want to find a cheaper one, but at the same time do not lose in quality. Often, looking frivolously to such a difficult task, the search for a future office is assigned to the secretary. So what to look for when choosing an office, if you have not had such experience, and what could be the catch of a low rental rate, says Ekaterina Volkova, director of the research department at ILM. At the very first stage, as soon as you opened the base of offices on the Internet and sorted it by price, you will most likely see inexpensive offers with a comment: “Poor transport accessibility.” What does this mean in practice? For example, an office may be located far from a metro station, and if you have many middle managers, then it will be very difficult for them to get to work. The lack of public transport in general can also be attributed to this point, especially with regard to poor-quality offices located on the territory of small industrial zones. In addition, the lack of parking or the exorbitant price of parking space is an additional anti-bonus when choosing an office. Also the low price for rent is formed by the so-called negative environment. This includes proximity to industrial areas, plants, landfills. Inexpensive you can rent an office, for example, near the well-known oil refinery, which is located in the south of the capital. The unfavorable view from the window or the lack of it can be attributed to the negative environment. If you already swept away all the most depressive rent options and at first glance found a  good quality office, find out the size of operating costs. They may be higher than you expect for a number of reasons. First, the building may be the only and expensive Internet service provider. Typically, such a provider, as well as the management company, is an affiliate with the owner of the object. This situation is most often found at class C facilities. Utility payments can be billed separately, and their size will differ every month, specify this nuance in advance. When the office seems to suit you at all points, you need to go to the object and personally inspect the premises. It may be that it has long been in need of repair or after the departure of the previous tenant there remained a chaos, which you will have to get rid of at your own expense. So, we list separately all the negative points that may affect office pricing: - Negative environment (proximity to industrial areas, factories, landfills). - Lack of parking. - Poor views / no windows. - Condition of repair or poor condition of the premises after the departure of the previous tenant. - A rather low rental rate, but a very high amount of operating expenses. - Expensive internet from a monopolist provider. Source article: portal "Real Estate and Prices"
Read more
12.05.2017
wa tg